Opportunities for Linking Women, Peace and Security to the US Department of Energy

In October 2000, the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security (WPS). To date, more than half (107) of all United Nations member states have adopted National Action Plans to address the experiences of women and girls in conflict and their security needs as required by the resolution. The United States is among them, with the US Department of Defense, US Department of State, US Agency for International Development, and US Department of Homeland Security each issuing their own implementation plans for WPS. Importantly, the US Department of Energy (DOE), and most especially, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), despite having much to offer on the implementation of WPS, has been noticeably absent in this policy space. In this article, we lay out the opportunities that exist for DOE and NNSA to implement WPS. First, we present an analysis of what states around the world have included in their National Action Plans with regard to energy, nuclear, and environmental policies as these are most closely related to the work of DOE. Then, we consider opportunities for DOE to build upon these links by adopting practices toward gender balancing (i.e., increasing the inclusion of women) and gender mainstreaming (i.e., assessing the influence of gender on policy outcomes). By adopting gender balancing and gender mainstreaming practices, DOE can affect the inclusion of women within its institutions and the lived experiences of women outside of them.

Gallagher, Maryann E. and Howell, Elizabeth (2023) “Opportunities for Linking Women, Peace and Security to the US Department of Energy,” International Journal of Nuclear Security: Vol. 8: No. 2, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.7290/ijns979673

Full Article


Is He Speaking Our Language? Donald Trump’s Leadership Traits in Comparison with Previous Presidents

We begin this analysis of Trump’s leadership traits with a short overview of Hermann’s LTA framework. We then turn to the profile of President Trump, comparing his leadership trait profile with those of US presidents since 1980. The norming data for the LTA rely on a sample of more than 200 world leaders,5 which enables us to describe how these U.S. presidents compare with and deviate from typical world leaders. Based on Trump’s profile, he is best described as a directive leader. We explore what a directive leader looks like in practice using two cases of Trump’s decision-making: the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria and U.S. policy toward North Korea. In the final section, we consider the implications of Trump’s leadership style for foreign policy decision-making, as this is the domain where presidents’ personalities are likely to have the most direct influence. Trump’s traits are likely to result in an unfocused, at times contradictory, and antagonistic foreign policy.

Susan H. Allen, Maryann E. Gallagher, Is He Speaking Our Language? Donald Trump’s Leadership Traits in Comparison with Previous Presidents, Political Science Quarterly, Volume 137, Issue 3, Fall 2022, Pages 539–568, https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13385

Full Article


The Latest News from SPIA

Accessibility by Design
March 2026 MPA Student of the Month: Julia Straka
Remembering Dr. Igor Khripunov

Join us for an Event

Apr 1

Dunn Lecture

1:15 PM - 2:45 PM

Apr 10

MPA Gwinnett Lunch & Learn

12:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Apr 16