Originally, I signed up for PADP4650 to complete additional course requirements for my Political Science major, I expected a very heavy lecture and chart-based class where we would learn about how laws were passed. Instead, I was surprised when presented with
the opportunity to work on a semester long project exploring a bill of my choice and its process of being passed. My group and I selected California’s Fair Pay to Play Act (FPPA) as it is currently reshaping college athletics. FPPA ended up revealing just how complex
policymaking really is.
The Fair Pay to Play Act allows colligate student-athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness (more commonly referred to as NIL). FPPA marked the end of decades of NCAA restrictions and opened the doors to new financial opportunities for athletes. The
Act did not come without major gaps and regulatory issues. Without federal standards, NIL polices vary across states which give wealthier schools and advantage that smaller schools cannot afford. This policy is a prime example of well-intentioned reforms that
exacerbate inequalities if not coordinated properly.
As my research continued throughout the semester, I was fascinated seeing one state’s decision causing a ripple effect nationwide. The FPPA pushed other states to adopt similar laws to California and ultimately called on the NCAA for overall reform. This rapid
adaptation and progress, while once again well-intentioned, exposed a major loophole. The “No Conflict Clause” later was added to limit issues between individual athletes signing contracts that impeded sponsors of their school.
While working on this project, I not only signed up for a Public Administration minor, but I was also reminded why it was so important for me to study through SPIA. SPIA stands to prepare their students to solve problems that do not have answers that are found right in
front of us; the same way that policies and policies will never be a one size fits all answers. Every assignment, whether I am studying a bill or making up a hypothetical policy proposal, I am prepared to think critically about the structure, equity, and the people affected by any
“solution” we are seeking to come up with.
Written by:
Anabella van Kempen
B.A. Philosophy; B.A. Political Science; B.A. Sociology | Class of 2027
